DID HE REALLY DO IT?
You all have probably heard about the case of Adnan Syed by now.. There has been a lot of debate over it all. Was it a rightful conviction? Or is he innocent? Most people have said they believe he is guilty, but today, I’m going to tell you 3 reasons why he is innocent, and that he indeed did NOT murder his high school ex-girlriend.
#1: LOSS OF MEMORY
You think that you would remember such a significant day if you reflected back on your past, don’t you? Well, Adnan does not recall anything other than a normal day the day of the murder. He explained that nothing out of the ordinary occurred. Just a typical day in the life of a teen! Adnan proves to be a smart kid, and it is uncharacteristic of him to not remember something like this. He didn’t see that day as anything other than the norm.
Additionally, if he had killed her, he would have set it up in a way that nothing would be tied to him. He would have a solid alibi to back himself up, making sure he was with someone who would have remembered what they did that night. He would have hard proof of where he was in those minutes that she was murdered. So, the fact that he has none of this and was completely taken by surprise when something like this occurred while he was living his every day life, leads me to believe that he is not responsible.
#2: NO HARD EVIDENCE
No where has there been any hard evidence found that Adnan is guilty of murdering his ex-girlfriend. There was proof at all. No fingerprints on Hae’s body, no DNA of his at the scene… no factual evidence that he committed this crime what so ever. How could the authorities convict someone with no evidence to back up their actions? That just goes to show that he was wrongfully convicted. He was put into jail for almost two decades based on his friends story… seems pretty sketchy to me. Teenagers lie all the time. How can you base a conviction on this? In my opinion, or at least what it seems like to me is that they were either too lazy to keep investigating or could not find any other proof. They chose not to include Asia McLain’s story, because they did not think it would help at all. So they went with the only story they had, even though there was no proof to back Jay up. And this brings my to my third point, Jay’s story.
#3: JAY’S STORY
Jay was supposedly one of Adnan’s friends… They hung out often and enjoyed doing ‘teenage things’ together. But, once the investigation began, Jay clearly forgot about thei friendship and made up a story of the events HE SAID occurred that day. Jay claims that Adnan told him everything about his plan to kill Hae: Jay was going to take Adnan’s car and then after Adnan murdered Hae, Jay was going to go meet him at Best Buy. He also told the police and investigators that he met Adnan at best buy. Adnan was driving Hae’s car and Jay was driving Adnans. He asked him to meet him there so he could help bury Hae’s body. After hearing what Jay has to say, especially compared to what Adnan said before, their stories are completely opposite. They don’t align at all. You would think there would be some overlap somewhere. Jay also doesn’t sound too confident when he speaks, which leads me to think that he is hiding something.
SO…..
Honestly, I really do believe that Adnan Syed is innocent. After listening to the story over and over again, it would just not make sense for him to be guilty. There are too many missing pieces to the puzzle. There is not enough evidence to prove that he is guilty.. How can you trust other teenagers to tell the truth about what happened. Something just seems a bit fishy… More investigating should have been done and proof found in order to convict him. Imagine being stuck in prison because of a complete lie? For something you didn’t even do? Adnan DID NOT MURDER HAE!